NEWS - VIEWS - REVIEWS
   

T M KRISHNA AT MUSIC ACADEMY

    

Great veterans like Ariyakudi Ramanuja Iyengar, Chembai Vaidyanatha Bhagavatar, Alathur brothers etc invariably commenced their concerts with a Tana Varnam in madhyamakala or two degrees of speed. T M Krishna, in his concert at the Music Academy on 28th December 2000, straightaway plunged into Tyagaraja's 'Merusamana' in Mayamalavagowla. It may prove his thorough confidence in setting the ball rolling, but it can also be taken as disregard for tradition and convention. Young and upcoming artistes are expected to show a little more humility and respect for the art. In music, one would do well to remember that the elders have been greater and wiser.
     

The second item in Atana was a Tiruvembavai verse. One more kriti plainly rendered in madhyamakala could have also been squeezed before taking up Anandabhairavi (Syama Sastri's O Jagadamba, Adi tala). Except for a few phrases, which sounded strange to the ears, Krishna gave Anandabhairavi a good, classical mould. The Antara gandhara and Kakali nishada were avoided and proved his noble attitude. Todi was the highlight of the concert. No ultra-modern phrases were found. Tyagaraja's masterpiece, 'Dachukovalena' with neraval and kalpanaswaras at 'Sowmitri tyagaraju' brought out the aspects of vidwat in the artiste.

The rendering of Sankarabharanam had the required stature for the Ragam Tanam Pallavi. It is a mystery as to how and why a Tanam should be concluded in the slow tempo as Krishna did. The characteristic feature of Tanam is itself madhyamakala (medium tempo). As a matter of fact, Tanam is another term for madhyamakala. The traditional Pallavi (Inakulatilaka dasarathe karunapayonidhe) was in 4-kalai with an eduppu of half beat.

With all the merits in him, Krishna would do well to improve his mouthing and intonation of the sahitya. He need not be vehemently expressive either and make certain portions of his concerts noisy. For his age, he could exercise a little restraint in his gesticulations and paying encomiums to his accompanists.

     
R K Sriramkumar (violin), who has earned a name as an able accompanist, sticks to the traditional path of the elders. However his execution lacks weight in many phrasings and the notes often fall short of their necessary place values. His swara renditions need considerable improvement. Arun Prakash (mridangam) is very enthusiastic throughout without being dominating. But he has to work on his kalapramanam (gait) particularly while accompanying chowka kala (slow tempo) kritis and the higher speed swaras. B S Purushottaman (Khanjira) is one artiste who excels whenever and wherever he performs. Arun Prakash and he gave a good Tani avartanam. 

     

News Views Reviews

Posted on 30th December 2000

   

Photo Gallery